Many of these congregations are built around personalities, not doctrine. Loyalty is to the pastor, not Christ
For a faith that
preaches love, humility, and unity in Christ, the Church in India – especially Protestant
churches -- has mastered the art of division. From pulpit politics to
denominational arrogance, from petty turf wars to theological snobbery, Indian
Christianity today is fractured beyond recognition. Every group claims to
represent “true faith,” every pastor insists his interpretation of the Bible is
correct, and every denomination competes for influence, funds, and followers.
The result: a spiritual marketplace filled with noise, rivalry, and confusion —
a far cry from the early church that “had one heart and one mind.”
Nowhere is this
disunity more glaring than among Protestant churches. What began as a few
missionary denominations during the colonial era has exploded into hundreds of
fragmented groups — Anglican, Methodist, Baptist, Lutheran, Presbyterian,
Pentecostal, Charismatic, Evangelical, Reformed, Independent, and countless
“ministries” and “fellowships” that operate like private businesses.
Each claims divine
legitimacy, but few can agree on even the most basic doctrines. Some stress
baptism by immersion, others insist on sprinkling. Some emphasize the gifts of
the Holy Spirit, others dismiss them as emotionalism. Some preach prosperity
and success; others preach suffering and endurance. Even the Lord’s Supper,
meant to symbolize unity, is conducted differently in nearly every
denomination. The fragmentation is not theological diversity — it is spiritual
chaos.
The old missionary
churches — the Church of South India (CSI), the Church of North India (CNI),
the Mar Thoma, the Baptists and Lutherans — are trapped in bureaucracy and
ritual. Their liturgies are frozen relics, their institutions riddled with
corruption, and their clergy more concerned with hierarchy than holiness.
Meanwhile, the newer Pentecostal and Charismatic movements have become breeding
grounds for self-appointed “prophets” and “apostles,” many of whom manipulate
Scripture to build personal empires. The Body of Christ, in India today, looks
less like a living organism and more like a battlefield of egos.
The Business of
Faith
Disunity is not
accidental; it is profitable. Every breakaway pastor who disagrees with his
senior starts a new church, complete with his own logo, social media presence,
and donation QR code. Church growth is no longer measured in transformed lives
but in YouTube subscribers, foreign donations, and the size of the Sunday
crowd.
When money enters the
pulpit, unity exits the door. Theologians write papers about “missional
cooperation,” but on the ground, pastors compete for sheep like rival
shopkeepers fighting over customers. Congregations are poached, worship leaders
are lured away with promises of salary hikes, and “revival crusades” are staged
mainly to expand mailing lists. Even charity is weaponized — feeding programs
and orphanages double as recruitment drives.
Ask ten churches in
any city to come together for a common humanitarian project, and watch the
chaos unfold: quarrels over leadership, branding, and credit. Each group
insists on stamping its name on the banner. In the process, the message of
Christ is lost under a flood of logos and egos.
Doctrinal Wars and the Battle for the Bible
Indian Christians
love quoting Scripture — mostly to attack each other. The Bible has become
ammunition for doctrinal warfare. While one faction shouts about grace, another
counters with holiness. One group preaches faith healing; another accuses them
of heresy. One sings of prosperity; another sneers that true Christians should
suffer.
Instead of engaging
thoughtfully, many pastors use the pulpit to ridicule others. Social media has
amplified the noise — YouTube sermons now double as smear campaigns. Channels
devoted to “exposing false prophets” and “debunking heretical preachers” get more
views than messages on compassion or forgiveness. Theological debate has
degenerated into digital mud-wrestling.
This obsession with
doctrinal superiority reveals an ugly truth: for many church leaders, truth is
not about revelation but about reputation. It is less about Christ’s teaching
and more about personal authority. The Bible is twisted to justify power, wealth,
and exclusivity. Jesus’ command to “love one another” is conveniently
forgotten.
Caste, Class and
Culture: The Silent Dividers
Even after two
millennia, the Indian Church remains unable to break free from the shackles of
caste and class. The very institution that preaches equality before God often
mirrors the social hierarchies of the outside world. In Kerala, caste-based
congregations exist side by side, each worshipping the same Christ but
unwilling to share the same pew. In Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, Dalit
Christians are segregated in church functions and denied leadership roles.
Urban churches are
divided by class and language: English-speaking congregations attract the
educated elite; Tamil, Hindi or Malayalam congregations serve the working
class. A Sunday morning in any metropolitan area reveals the uncomfortable
truth — the church reflects India’s inequality rather than transforming it.
Missionaries may have
preached about breaking barriers, but Indian Christians rebuilt them inside the
sanctuary. Even the “united” churches like the CSI and CNI remain divided
internally by region, language and caste. Unity in name, division in reality.
The Politics of
the Pulpit
Politics further
deepens the fracture. Churches often mirror ideological camps — some aligning
with liberal activism, others with right-wing nationalism or conservative
social values. Instead of being prophetic voices, many pulpits have become
political platforms. Pastors preach against rival ideologies more than they
preach against sin.
The church’s voice on
national issues is fragmented. On persecution, conversions, or human rights,
denominations issue separate statements, often contradicting one another. Some
fear losing government recognition or foreign funding; others court political
favour. In the end, the Indian Church speaks in many tongues — not of the Holy
Spirit, but of political calculation.
When the faithful see
church leaders bicker in public and issue contradictory press notes, their
confidence erodes. A disunited church loses moral authority.
Welfare without
Witness
One of the few areas
where Indian churches once stood tall was welfare — schools, hospitals,
orphanages, and social work. Yet even here, disunity and competition creep in.
Institutions that began as acts of service have become fiefdoms. Denominations
fight over ownership of land and property. Court cases between church factions
are routine.
In many cases, the
welfare arm of the church has become disconnected from its spiritual arm.
Institutions run professionally but with little Christian witness. Staff
appointments are political; funds are mishandled; and the church’s mission is
reduced to mere philanthropy. “Welfare spirituality” — serving without soul —
is now the norm.
This
professionalization of charity is convenient: it allows the church to remain
visible and respected while avoiding controversial evangelistic work. But it
also exposes a deeper malaise — a faith that has lost its conviction and
replaced it with corporate management.
The Pentecostal Paradox
The rise of
Pentecostal and charismatic churches was supposed to renew Indian Christianity
with spiritual fire. Instead, it has unleashed another wave of fragmentation.
Every gifted preacher soon becomes “Founder and Senior Pastor” of a new
ministry. Rivalries erupt between churches barely a kilometre apart.
Many of these
congregations are built around personalities, not doctrine. Loyalty is to the
pastor, not Christ. When the leader falls — morally or financially — the church
collapses. Emotional preaching, prosperity theology, and miracle marketing have
turned worship into spectacle. The Holy Spirit is invoked as a brand.
While Pentecostalism
has indeed brought energy, zeal, and indigenous leadership, it has also
multiplied confusion. The movement lacks accountability, structure, and
theological depth. Its expansion mirrors India’s political populism — loud,
charismatic, and dangerously leader-centric.
The Catholic–Protestant Chasm
Even between
Catholics and Protestants, the wall remains high. Centuries after the
Reformation, suspicion persists. Catholics accuse Protestants of arrogance;
Protestants dismiss Catholics as ritualistic and idolatrous. Rarely do they
collaborate meaningfully.
While Catholic
institutions dominate education and healthcare, Protestants run parallel
setups, often duplicating effort rather than cooperating. Ecumenical dialogues
exist on paper, but on the ground, mistrust reigns. In mixed families or
inter-church marriages, the divide becomes painfully personal. The tragedy is
that both sides read the same Bible, pray to the same God, and yet cannot stand
side by side in worship.
Imported Theology,
Lost Relevance
Another source of
division is India’s blind imitation of Western theological models. Seminaries
in India still fight over whether to follow American evangelicalism, European
liberalism, or Korean revivalism. Each wave of foreign influence spawns new
factions and vocabulary — “Word of Faith,” “Reformed,” “Charismatic,”
“Seeker-sensitive,” “Emergent,” and so on.
Instead of developing
a coherent Indian theology rooted in our soil, many churches copy Western
templates, complete with imported worship styles, English lyrics, and borrowed
controversies. The result is cultural schizophrenia — churches that look American
on stage and Indian only in audience. This dependence breeds rivalry, as every
imported idea becomes another reason for division.
Underneath the theological quarrels lies a deeper sin —
pride. Pastors guard their territories like politicians guarding
constituencies. Elections for bishoprics or synod posts are fought like
corporate battles, with bribes, lobbying, and smear campaigns. When leaders
preach humility and then fight for power, credibility dies.
Even in small
congregations, petty politics thrives: who sits in the front row, who leads the
choir, who gets to preach on Sunday. Gossip, slander, and backstabbing are
common. Some churches split over music style; others over property disputes.
The enemy does not need to persecute the church — it is already destroying
itself from within.
The Cost of
Division
The human cost of
this disunity is enormous. Ordinary believers are left confused and cynical.
Young people drift away, disgusted by hypocrisy. Non-Christians see the
bickering and mock the faith. Evangelism loses credibility when churches cannot
love each other.
Worse, when
persecution or social pressure arises, the fragmented church cannot mount a
united defense. Each denomination issues its own statement, runs its own legal
case, and pursues its own agenda. The persecuted believer often stands alone,
while the institutions argue about jurisdiction.
A divided church
cannot face a united world. Its witness loses power because its words and
actions contradict each other.
Can the Church
Heal Itself?
Healing begins with
repentance, not strategy. The Indian Church must first acknowledge that its
divisions are not “differences in calling” but sins of pride, greed, and
insecurity. No amount of ecumenical conferences or inter-church councils will
work unless leaders humble themselves.
Unity does not
require uniformity. It requires mutual respect, shared purpose, and a return to
essentials — Christ above denomination, service above ambition, humility above
hierarchy. Churches can cooperate in education, disaster relief, and moral
witness without merging creeds. The world does not need one mega-church; it
needs a coherent Christian presence that speaks with integrity.
But that will happen
only when leaders stop worshipping their institutions and start serving their
people. The pulpit must be reclaimed from power brokers and showmen.
Theological education must emphasize ethics and accountability, not just dogma.
Believers must learn to discern manipulation and demand transparency.
Unity is not a
sentimental dream. It is a command from Christ — “that they may all be one.”
The tragedy of Indian Christianity is not persecution from outside, but
corrosion from inside. The enemy is not ideology, government, or culture — it
is our own arrogance.
Conclusion: A Call
to Conscience
The Church in India
stands at a crossroads. It can continue down the path of fragmentation,
becoming ever more irrelevant, or it can rediscover the radical simplicity of
the gospel. The choice is moral, not administrative.
Disunity has made the
church loud but hollow — rich in rituals, poor in relationships; busy with
programs, barren in love. If Indian Christians do not confront this sickness,
their institutions will keep expanding even as their souls wither.
The future of the
Indian Church depends on whether it can look in the mirror and confess: “We are
divided because we have replaced Christ with ourselves.” Until that confession
happens, all talk of revival is hypocrisy, and all talk of unity is theatre.
The greatest scandal
in Indian Christianity is not persecution, not poverty, not politics — it is
disunity born of pride. A divided church cannot heal a broken nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment