Msgr. Thomas Moothedan — Translator, Scholar, and Builder of Malayalam Biblical Language

Edited by George Mathew

Msgr. Thomas Moothedan stands among the most important Catholic scholars of twentieth-century Kerala, India, for his singular achievement: a complete Malayalam translation of the Bible grounded in the Syriac Peshitta and the Latin Vulgate. His work—published during the 1960s—was more than a literary or academic exercise. It represented the careful weaving together of liturgical fidelity, rigorous scholarship, and a deliberate stylistic clarity that aimed to make Scripture both authoritative and immediately intelligible to Malayalam readers.

By drawing upon classical sources, his deep knowledge of Syriac traditions among the Saint Thomas Christians, and his disciplined literary sensibility, Msgr. Moothedan produced a version that influenced later Catholic translations and shaped biblical language in Kerala for decades. His life, his intellectual background, and his methods reveal how one man could become a bridge between the ancient world of Syriac Christianity and the modern context of Kerala’s Catholic community.

 He translated the Bible to Malayalam language in 1963.

Life and Scholarly Background

Msgr. Thomas Moothedan was a Catholic priest and scholar from central Kerala. His career was wide-ranging: it combined pastoral ministry, college teaching, and academic administration. He hailed from the Moothedan family of Meloor, near Chalakudy in Thrissur district.
He was born on March 7, 1911, and received his priesthood from Ampitiya Papa Seminary, Kandy, Sri Lanka. His formal academic qualifications—he held an M.A. as well as a Doctorate in Divinity (D.D.)—placed him in a rare group of priest-scholars who could combine theological expertise with administrative responsibility. He was Headmaster of St. George High School, Kanjoor, from 1950 to 1957. He became Mathematics Professor and Vice Principal of Nirmala College from 1957 to 1963. He contributed to the institution’s growth in its early years.
One of his most visible roles was his leadership at St. Thomas College, Thrissur, where he served as Principal between 1963 and 1971. During that period, he became a well-known figure in Kerala’s academic and ecclesiastical circles. He also became a Member of the Syndicate of Calicut University.
 He received the Monsignor title, an honorific form of address granted by the Pope to certain priests as a mark of distinction, in 1975.
 Msgr. Moothedan passed away in Meloor on February 11, 1985.

 Beyond the institutional record, his life intersected with families and communities in meaningful ways. (For example, he played a role in arranging the marriage of the Editor’s parents Prof. V. A. Mathew of Nirmala College’s Chemistry Department with M. J. Annam of the Moothedan family—his niece who was then a school teacher). Such episodes remind us that he was not only a scholar of repute but also a priest involved in the personal and cultural fabric of Kerala Catholic life.

 His roots in that region placed him firmly within the Saint Thomas Christian heritage, a community with centuries of connection to Syriac liturgy. His later work would constantly draw on this background.

 Travel was also a significant part of his life. He journeyed across Africa and Europe, and his travelogues, published during the 1960s and 1970s, reached a wide readership. These writings reveal another side of him: a curious, observant priest who wished to share his encounters with the wider world with Malayalam readers.

 His biography must also be placed against the cultural backdrop of the Saint Thomas Christian communities of Kerala. These communities preserved Syriac liturgical and textual traditions well into the twentieth century, maintaining a living link with the Eastern Christian world. The Syriac heritage provided both a liturgical rhythm and a textual base for Kerala Christians, and Msgr. Moothedan was conscious of this when he undertook his monumental translation of the Bible. His life thus becomes a lens into the meeting of tradition, scholarship, and pastoral commitment.

The Translation: Sources, Method, and Publication

 The central academic achievement of Msgr. Moothedan was his complete Malayalam translation of the Bible. Unlike earlier partial attempts, his work covered the entire canon and aimed to serve as an authoritative Catholic edition for use in parishes, homes, and seminaries.

He explicitly chose two primary sources: the Syriac Peshitta and the Latin Vulgate. This decision was both symbolic and practical. The Peshitta represented the Eastern tradition—long cherished in Kerala’s Syriac Christian communities. The Vulgate represented the Western tradition—officially recognized by the Catholic Church and providing doctrinal and textual stability.

By holding both traditions together, Msgr. Moothedan produced a translation that satisfied liturgical continuity with Kerala’s past while also meeting Catholic expectations of textual reliability. His Bible, most often dated to 1963, became a landmark. Some accounts mention revisions or re-issues in later years—particularly 1968—but the consensus is that the complete Bible was published in the 1960s, firmly rooted in his chosen dual sources.

Method and Linguistic Approach

 The translation process was guided by a principle of balancing fidelity to the source texts with sensitivity to liturgical usage. The Peshitta allowed him to remain close to readings familiar in worship and Syriac commentary, while the Vulgate ensured that his choices were aligned with Catholic doctrine. His goal was not simply academic accuracy but a translation that could live within the liturgical and devotional life of Malayalam-speaking Catholics.

 Msgr. Moothedan aimed to produce Malayalam that was lucid—clear, direct, and widely accessible—and strong—phrased in a way that carried theological weight and rhetorical authority. Rather than smoothing difficult passages into flat prose, he often preserved the rhetorical intensity of the original. His translation philosophy was thus a conscious choice: to make Scripture resonate with power while remaining intelligible.

 Malayalam Christianity carries a long legacy of Syriac influence, particularly in sacramental and liturgical terms. Recognizing this, Msgr. Moothedan deliberately retained or reintroduced Syriac idioms where they clarified theological meaning. This continuity preserved the doctrinal and cultural resonance of older liturgical language, while also ensuring that the Bible spoke directly to the ecclesial memory of Kerala Christians.

Characteristics of Msgr. Moothedan’s Language

 To understand why his Malayalam is described as both lucid and strong, it is helpful to note some specific stylistic choices. Instead of long, meandering constructions, he preferred compact, brisk sentences where the verb carried much of the meaning. This style gave immediacy to Scriptural commands and prophetic oracles.

 He avoided obscure archaisms, choosing instead elevated Malayalam words that conveyed theological nuance but remained within the grasp of educated churchgoers. The result was solemn but not stilted, dignified but still readable.

 By echoing parallelism, inversion, and syntactic balance, he reproduced in Malayalam the cadence of Hebrew and Syriac texts. This gave his translation a prophetic and poetic rhythm that made it memorable in liturgical contexts.

 Where Syriac phrases carried essential theological meaning, he preserved them, sometimes explaining them in notes. This approach retained the precision of sacramental and liturgical vocabulary while giving Malayalam readers a sense of continuity with their Syriac Christian heritage.

Reception and Influence

 When his translation appeared in the 1960s, it met an immediate need. Catholics in Kerala now had a full Bible translation that they could use confidently in both liturgical and devotional settings.

 The reception was generally positive. Ordinary readers appreciated its clarity and resonance with familiar liturgical language. Scholars praised his careful consultation of ancient sources. Some literary critics noted that the elevated register occasionally made reading dense, but they acknowledged the solemnity it conveyed.

Institutionally, the response was strong enough to ensure that his translation continued to serve as a reference point for decades. It shaped Catholic reading and teaching of Scripture across Kerala.

Influence on Later Translations

 Although Msgr. Moothedan’s translation was highly influential, it was not the final word. In later decades, translation commissions such as those of the Kerala Catholic Bishops’ Council (KCBC) undertook newer projects. These later versions often relied more on critical Hebrew and Greek texts and sought more contemporary Malayalam idioms.

 Yet even as these new translations emerged, they remained indebted to Msgr. Moothedan’s pioneering work. His choice of the Peshitta and Vulgate, his sensitivity to liturgical usage, and his stylistic priorities influenced how Catholic translators approached their tasks. Later translations might have modernized the idiom, but they built upon the foundation of liturgical continuity and scholarly seriousness that he had established.

Legacy Beyond the Text

 Msgr. Moothedan’s contributions extended beyond the Bible translation itself. His tenure as Principal at St. Thomas College, Thrissur, left a lasting institutional impact. Students and colleagues recall his emphasis on uniting scholarship with pastoral care. The college continues to commemorate him through memorial lectures and institutional histories.

 Within his family and community, he is remembered as a priest who combined learning with deep concern for people’s lives. His travels and widely read travel books expanded his influence beyond the church, reaching the general Malayalam reading public. His life showed that translation, education, and cultural exchange all belonged to the same mission of forming conscience and culture.

Questions and Critical Reflections

 No translation is beyond critique, and it is important to recognize the limitations of Msgr. Moothedan’s work. By privileging the Peshitta and Vulgate, he aligned with Catholic and Syriac traditions, but he did not use the critical Hebrew and Greek texts that modern biblical scholarship values. Later translators who consulted those sources sometimes arrived at different renderings.

 His Malayalam style, while dignified, is less colloquial than some modern readers prefer. Younger audiences often lean toward more contemporary translations. This reflects the perennial tension between solemnity and accessibility.

 Despite these critiques, his work gave continuity to the Syriac-inflected Christian heritage of Kerala. For communities whose faith identity is shaped by that heritage, continuity can matter as much as textual precision.

Conclusion — Why Msgr. Moothedan Matters

 Msgr. Thomas Moothedan matters because he embodied the rare union of scholarly erudition and pastoral concern. His complete Malayalam Bible—anchored in both the Peshitta and the Vulgate—provided Kerala Catholics with a Scripture that carried liturgical authority and personal clarity. His stylistic choices made the Bible readable, solemn, and resonant with Syriac tradition.

Even as later translations adapt to new scholarship and changing readerships, his work remains a milestone. It demonstrated that translation is not just about transferring words from one language to another; it is about shaping the very way a community hears and prays its Scriptures. In this sense, Msgr. Moothedan’s legacy continues to live on—in the language of worship, in the history of Catholic scholarship in Kerala, and in the memory of all who were shaped by his words.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.Kerala Bible Society — historical notes on Malayalam Catholic translations and the 1963 publication of Msgr. Thomas Moothedan’s translation. 

2. Fact sheet/ institutional page for St. Thomas College (Thrissur): records listing Msgr. Thomas Moothedan as Principal (1963–1971) and memorial lecture series. 

3. CMS India / research PDF on Malayalam translations and Fr. Emmanuel Andumalil (contains references to Msgr. Moothedan’s work and dating). 

4. Moothedan family / memorial site (local family and community material, biographical notes). 

5. Syriac Heritage of the Saint Thomas Christians — academic treatment of Syriac influence on Malayalam biblical and liturgical language that contextualizes Msgr. Moothedan’s source choices.

6. Academia.edu records

7. Ernakulam-Angamaly Archdiocese records

 

The Hijacked Church: Power, Politics and Profits Over the Gospel

 From Gospel to Greed: The Church’s Descent into Corporate Power

 There was a time when the Church was a sanctuary — not just a building, but a mission. A beacon for the broken, the lost, the humble and the poor. It was never meant to be a profit-making enterprise. It was never designed to compete with corporations, run real estate empires, or operate like multinational conglomerates. But today, that’s precisely what it has become.

 The Church has been hijacked. It has been institutionalised — bloated with bureaucracy, drenched in politics, and infected with the cancer of money and power. The message of Jesus Christ has been buried beneath marble floors and golden altars. The rugged cross of Calvary has been traded for air-conditioned sanctuaries and digital donation kiosks. The Gospel has become a side note, while business plans and infrastructure expansion have become the main agenda.

The Modern-Day Church: A Corporation in Disguise

Walk into any urban Church today and it feels less like a house of prayer and more like a corporate office. Sleek architecture, administrative blocks, auditoriums, and PR teams. Some churches even have branding consultants and marketing managers. The Church, which once thrived on faith and simplicity, now thrives on land acquisitions, legal teams, and financial portfolios.

Bishops and cardinals — once shepherds of the people — now live like royalty. They dwell in palatial residences, chauffeur-driven cars at their service, and entourages to maintain their schedules. They talk about humility from pulpits but walk in opulence behind the scenes. They are more at home in political circles and international summits than among the sick, the poor, or the lost.

The hierarchy has distanced itself from the grassroots. The bishops have become bureaucrats, the cardinals – aristocrats. They are no longer accessible to the common faithful. They live in ivory towers, disconnected from the daily struggles of the people. They preach about the suffering of Christ, but their lives resemble that of kings, not servants.

Evangelisation: The Forgotten Mission

What happened to evangelisation? What happened to missionary work, the lifeblood of the early Church? The passion to spread the Good News has been replaced with a passion to expand campuses. The zeal for souls has been traded for a thirst for wealth.

In earlier centuries, missionaries walked through forests, risked death, and faced hostility to preach the Gospel. Today, evangelism has become inconvenient, even unfashionable. It’s barely mentioned anymore — unless it serves to solicit donations for some NGO-style report. The fire to win souls has been extinguished by the comfort of air-conditioned boardrooms and balance sheets.

Churches today are more concerned with opening colleges, engineering institutions, medical schools, shopping malls, and dairy farms. Yes, dairy farms — because now even milk is a “ministry”. These establishments rake in crores, all under the guise of “Christian service”, while the spiritual mission lies in ruins. Education and healthcare are essential, yes — but when they become profit centres and status symbols rather than expressions of love and service, something is deeply rotten.

The Gospel Replaced by Business Models

The teachings of Jesus were radical — simplicity, sacrifice, love, repentance. But now the Gospel is watered down into soft motivational sermons that won’t offend the rich donors. Prosperity theology is the new opium. Jesus flipping tables in the temple is never preached; instead, we’re taught to “sow a seed” and expect a miracle return.

Money has become the hidden god of the Church. It dictates decisions, it steers leadership choices, and it silences prophets. There are prayers for wealth, blessings, and success — but very few calls to repentance, humility, or sacrificial living. Holiness has taken a back seat. Popularity, convenience, and affluence are now the priorities.

Church functions are grandiose shows. They are less about worship and more about showcasing influence. VIP chairs, celebrity guests, massive LED screens, catered lunches — all to create an illusion of success. But peel back the surface and you’ll find spiritual emptiness.

Laity Organisations: Clubs in Disguise

What about the laity? The Fathers’ Groups, the Mothers’ Associations, the Youth Ministries? Many of these have degenerated into social clubs and networking platforms. They wear matching uniforms, hold rehearsed meetings, and gossip under the pretext of “fellowship”. They organise picnics, fashion shows, cooking competitions, and cultural evenings — but rarely do you hear of prayer vigils, fasting sessions, or soul-winning campaigns.

Fellowship has turned into elitism. The spiritual urgency is missing. The early church had believers breaking bread and praying in unity, enduring persecution together. Today, laity groups fight over seating arrangements, who gets to sit in the front pew, or whose name appears first on the programme sheet.

In the name of community building, these groups have turned into social ladders. They celebrate birthdays with cakes, but do not mourn over sin. They host talent nights, but neglect the broken-hearted in their midst. The Crucified Christ is not the centre — status and recognition are.

Jesus Christ: Ignored and Sidelined

Amid all this religious machinery, the One for whom the Church exists — Jesus Christ — has been ignored. Not denied, not rejected — just politely pushed to the side. He is mentioned in sermons, sung about in songs, but not followed in practice. His suffering, His humility, His call to die to self — all have been sterilised to suit our modern comforts.

There is no room for the Man of Sorrows in churches obsessed with success. There is no space for the Jesus who said “take up your cross and follow Me” in a Christianity that is more about convenience than conviction. The crucified Christ is too uncomfortable a figure. We want a sanitized saviour, not a suffering servant. We want a Jesus who blesses our plans, not one who demands repentance.

The Cross, once central, is now an accessory. It’s engraved in gold, hung in churches, worn on necks — but not carried in real life. The Church preaches resurrection without crucifixion, victory without obedience, glory without suffering. It has become a religion of shortcuts, not surrender.

The Rise of Celebrity Clergy

And now we have celebrity pastors and superstar priests. They have fan followings, media appearances, and social media pages managed like influencers. They brand themselves, sell books, do interviews — but are rarely seen ministering in slums, prisons, or hospitals unless there’s a photo op. Their theology is tailored to please, not to pierce.

It’s all about building “ministries”, collecting followers, and showcasing charisma. These modern spiritual celebrities have platforms, not altars. They seek applause, not accountability. They are adored, not corrected.

And the bishops — many of them behave like CEOs. They wear crowns and vestments worth lakhs, attend global conferences, but are tone-deaf to the suffering of their own congregations. They speak of justice, but tolerate corruption. They preach love, but silence whistleblowers. When scandals erupt, they protect the institution, not the truth.

The Silence of the Lambs

Where are the prophets in the Church? Where are the voices crying in the wilderness? Most have been silenced, ignored, or driven out. The Church no longer tolerates truth-tellers. It prefers diplomats over disciples, managers over martyrs.

Anyone who dares to question the rot is labelled rebellious or “lacking grace”. The institution protects itself by suppressing dissent. And so, the cycle continues. The machinery rolls on. The structures expand. The budgets grow. But the Spirit is absent.

It is a tragic irony that the Church, meant to carry the light, has itself become a shadow. Instead of setting the world on fire with holiness and truth, it has become lukewarm — neither hot nor cold — fit only to be spat out, as Christ warned in Revelation.

Where Do We Go from Here?

Is there hope? Yes. But it will not come from committees, fundraisers, or five-year strategic plans. It will come through repentance — deep, painful, unapologetic repentance. The Church must fall on its face before God and admit: we have strayed, we have compromised, we have institutionalised what was meant to be a movement of the Spirit.

The Gospel must return to the centre. The Cross must regain its rightful place. Christ must no longer be a figurehead — He must be Lord again. Not just in doctrine, but in practice.

We need shepherds who smell like sheep. Leaders who live simply, pray deeply, and serve sacrificially. We need churches that care more about the lost than about land deals. We need laity who burn with a desire for holiness, not hierarchy. We need revival — not of noise and lights, but of brokenness, confession, and surrender.

The early Church turned the world upside down without buildings, budgets, or branding. They had power because they had purity. They had authority because they had intimacy with God. That is what we must return to.

Until then, the Church will remain a sleeping giant — rich, respected, and utterly irrelevant to a dying world.

Final Words

Jesus did not die for shopping malls, dairy farms, and multimillion-dollar church complexes. He did not suffer on a Roman cross so bishops could live like emperors and churches could hoard wealth under the guise of ministry. He died to save sinners. He rose again to empower disciples. He gave us a mission — to go, preach, baptise, and make disciples of all nations.

We were called to be salt and light — not status symbols and landowners. The Church was meant to be a living, breathing body of Christ — not a lifeless bureaucracy draped in robes and rituals. The early Church had no cathedrals, no endowments, no billion-rupee education empires — but it had power, because it had purity and purpose. That is what made it unstoppable.

Today, the Church has everything — except the presence of God.

We have microphones but no message. We have rituals but no reverence. We have structures but no spirit. We’ve turned houses of worship into theatres, pastors into performers, and services into stage shows. The cross has become decoration, not dedication. Christ has become a brand, not the burning centre of our lives.

The Church must awaken — not just rebrand. We don’t need another mission statement; we need brokenness and repentance. We don’t need smarter strategies; we need surrendered hearts. The time for shallow sermons and cosmetic spirituality is over.

The real Jesus is not sitting comfortably in our boardrooms. He is out in the streets, among the addicts, the outcasts, the wounded and the weary. He is waiting for His Church to remember what it once was — a people set apart, holy, hungry for truth, willing to lose everything for the sake of the Gospel.

 Until we tear down our ivory towers, lay aside our thrones, and return to the foot of the cross — we will keep playing church while the world burns. We must choose: either we institutionalise our faith to death, or we resurrect it with fire.

God is not impressed by our buildings, budgets, or branding. He is looking for hearts that tremble at His Word, lives laid down in obedience, and a Church that looks like Jesus — not a Fortune 500 company. Let the Church stop being a business. Let it be the Body again.

Let the crucified Christ be the centre again — not sidelined, not polished up for display, but embraced in His raw, radical call to die to ourselves and follow Him. Then, and only then, can we say: this is truly the Church of Jesus Christ.

 

The Curse of Property: How Greed is Tearing Kerala Families Apart

  Step into any civil court in Kerala, and one pattern repeats itself with numbing regularity — families locked in poisonous disputes over property. Court halls echo with surnames that once represented proud, united families. Today, those same names are dragged through legal mud: brother versus sister, brother versus brother, father against son, daughter against father. What should have been homes of love and kinship have turned into battlegrounds.

The Anatomy of Greed

 It begins almost innocently. Parents grow old. Property—land, houses, plantations, shops—sits waiting to be divided. Theoretically, there are wills, partitions, or family settlements. In practice, greed swallows everything.

 One brother wants a bigger share because he claims to have “looked after the parents.” A sister demands her lawful right, but brothers snarl that daughters have already been given gold in marriage. Children question fathers about inheritance while the old man is still alive. And when death finally comes, it is not grief that dominates the family courtyard but the question: “Who gets what?”

From Home to Courtroom

 Once the quarrels ignite, the courts become the new family gathering space. Lawyers thrive, fees soar, and relatives waste their hard-earned money feeding a system that drags on endlessly.

 Cases linger for ten, fifteen, twenty years. Generations grow old waiting for judgments. Court records in Kerala are full of partition suits filed in the 1980s that are still undecided. Judges retire, lawyers die, but the case files remain alive—ugly reminders of greed that refuses to die.

 And what happens to the property while the case crawls through the legal jungle? Often it lies unused, uncared for, and wasted. Beautiful ancestral homes decay. Coconut groves wither. Prime plots lie locked in endless “status quo” orders. What could have been productive assets turn into monuments of stubbornness.

Father vs Son, brother vs sister

 The ugliest battles are not between distant cousins but inside the closest bonds. Fathers dragging sons to court for grabbing property without consent. Sons counter-suing fathers, alleging unfair distribution. Daughters forced to sue their own parents for denying them rightful shares.

What does this achieve? Nothing but humiliation. The family that once prayed together in the same ancestral church now sits on opposite benches in court, glaring at each other like sworn enemies. Weddings become awkward, funerals turn hostile, and children grow up watching their parents and uncles spit venom at each other.

The Cost of Litigation

The financial cost is staggering. Lakhs of rupees go into legal fees, court expenses, endless travel to hearings. Families sell portions of land just to fight over another portion. In the end, they lose both — money and property.

But the emotional cost is far worse. Families break beyond repair. Cousins become strangers. Parents die without reconciliation. Brothers who grew up playing together end their lives not speaking to each other. All this, over what? Mud, bricks, and paper deeds.

Kerala’s Paradox

Kerala prides itself on education, progress, and high social awareness. Yet, in property matters, wisdom collapses. Families that preach Christian or Hindu values of sacrifice and detachment throw them away when it comes to inheritance. Even highly educated professionals — doctors, engineers, NRIs — fight like wild animals for a few cents of land in their native place.

Ironically, many of these people already live in comfort abroad or in cities. They don’t need the ancestral house or farmland. But the thought of “losing” property to a sibling burns their ego. It is less about need, more about pride and greed.

Generational Poison

The worst impact is on the next generation. Children grow up witnessing uncles and aunts fighting in court. They absorb bitterness instead of love. Cousins, instead of being friends, become lifelong rivals. The poison of one generation seeps into the next, creating divisions that last decades.

Even after court cases end, wounds do not heal. A judgment may say, “This land belongs to X, that house to Y.” But the real damage is invisible—the complete breakdown of trust and affection.

Stories That Break the Heart

A retired teacher in Kottayam, aged 78, spends her final years shuttling between court and hospital, fighting her own son who insists she “gift” him the house. She wanted to let her daughter live there. Son and mother, once inseparable, now don’t speak.

In Thrissur, two brothers stopped talking after their father’s death in 1995. A partition suit has dragged on for 28 years. The coconut grove they fought for now lies barren, overrun by weeds.

In Malappuram, a daughter had to fight her brothers for 15 years just to claim her legal share. By the time the case ended, the property was sold off to pay debts and legal costs. She got nothing.

These are not isolated cases. They are the tragic reality of thousands of Kerala families.

The Futility of it All

What is the point of all this? You will not carry property to your grave. You will not take an inch of land or a brick of a house when you die. Yet families destroy themselves over these temporary assets.

The irony is stark. Parents who sacrifice everything for children end up becoming victims of the same children’s greed. Siblings who once swore loyalty turn into courtroom enemies. Families who once gathered joyfully for Onam feasts now cross paths only in courtrooms.

In the end, everyone loses. Money is lost. Time is lost. Relationships are destroyed. Peace evaporates. And the so-called “victory” in court feels hollow because the price paid is far greater than the gain.

Why Does It Happen?

The root cause is simple: greed and ego. Greed, because no one is satisfied with their share. Ego, because giving up even a small portion feels like “losing.” Add to this the encouragement from lawyers who see long cases as profitable, and you have a recipe for endless battles.

The Way Forward

Kerala needs a cultural reset in how families handle property.

Transparent wills and settlements: Parents must write clear wills, registered and undisputed, before disputes arise.

Mediation instead of litigation: Families must resolve matters through dialogue, mediation, and panchayats, not courts.

Equal treatment of daughters: Kerala must shed the outdated notion that daughters are “outsiders.” They deserve equal rights.

Awareness of futility: Religious and community leaders must hammer home the truth—property is temporary, relationships are permanent.

A Sad State of Affairs

At its core, this is a tragedy. Families that should be sources of comfort have become breeding grounds of hatred. Courts that should dispense justice are clogged with petty inheritance disputes. Generations waste their lives chasing illusions of ownership.

Kerala, a state that prides itself on literacy, still refuses to learn the simplest lesson: You cannot take property to the grave. What you can take is the love and respect of your family. But sadly, too many choose land over love, money over peace, and ego over harmony.

Until this mindset changes, the sad stories will keep multiplying. The cemeteries of Kerala will continue to fill with people who left behind nothing but bitterness. And the next generation will inherit not property, but enmity.

 

Partiality in families: How parents cheat their daughters while dividing family assets

 Sons Inherit Everything and Daughters Get Nothing

  In the landscape of Indian families, one of the ugliest realities is the quiet but devastating injustice that daughters face when family assets are divided. Sons are often showered with land, homes, businesses, and money, while daughters are treated as outsiders in the very families that raised them. Parents, who are expected to embody fairness and love, often betray their daughters when wealth and property come into question. This partiality is not only archaic and discriminatory—it is also cruel, humiliating, and destructive.

 The history of this injustice runs deep in Indian society, with religion, customs, and patriarchal convenience used as excuses to deprive women of what is rightfully theirs. The Mary Roy case is a landmark reminder of how entrenched this discrimination has been and how long daughters had to wait to receive even a basic recognition of equality.

The Everyday Betrayal

 The cruelty of parents in showing partiality towards sons begins early. From childhood itself, sons are groomed to inherit, while daughters are made to feel temporary—destined to be “given away” in marriage. Parents justify their bias by saying, “Daughters will belong to another family,” as if that absolves them of responsibility towards their own flesh and blood.

  When the time comes to divide assets, daughters are either ignored completely or “settled” with token amounts or jewellery, while sons are handed over lands, houses, and businesses. Parents often cloak this injustice under the excuse of dowry, claiming that “we already gave you during marriage,” conveniently forgetting that dowry is an evil social practice, not a legitimate share of inheritance.

 The result? Families are torn apart. Sisters, who once shared the same roof and meals, are reduced to beggars at the doors of their own homes. Parents, instead of protecting their daughters’ rights, often become the very perpetrators of discrimination.

Mary Roy and the Legal Battle for Daughters

 The injustice became most visible in the case of Mary Roy, a Syrian Christian woman from Kerala, India. In her community, women were denied equal inheritance rights under the Travancore Christian Succession Act of 1916, which said that daughters could receive only one-fourth of a son’s share—or a maximum of ₹5,000—while sons inherited the lion’s share of property.

  Mary Roy refused to accept this absurd injustice. She filed a case in the Supreme Court, demanding equality in inheritance for Christian women in Kerala. In 1986, the Supreme Court delivered a historic judgment in her favor, ruling that Christian women in Kerala had the same inheritance rights as men under the Indian Succession Act of 1925.

 This was a thunderbolt against centuries of discrimination. It exposed how law, custom, and religion were being twisted to rob daughters of their rightful inheritance. Yet, despite the victory in court, Mary Roy’s personal battle for her share of property dragged on for decades, reflecting the social resistance to equality even after the law was clear.

Why Parents’ Partiality is Cruel

 It is important to understand that this partiality is not a harmless tradition—it is cruel and destructive on multiple levels.

It humiliates daughters: To be told, “You don’t deserve as much as your brother,” is nothing less than a slap in the face. It tells a daughter that her blood, sweat, and love for her family are less valuable than a son’s. It reduces her to a second-class child in her own home.

 It destroys family bonds: No injustice cuts deeper than when parents betray their daughters. Sisters who once shared the same parents are forced into legal battles with brothers. Families are torn apart in courtrooms, not because daughters are greedy, but because they were denied fairness.

 It reinforces patriarchy: By denying daughters their share, parents feed the larger social structure of patriarchy, where women are seen as dependent on men. Sons grow up entitled, while daughters are left vulnerable, often forced to rely on their husband’s family for survival.

 It exposes hypocrisy of parents: Parents who claim to love all children equally expose their hypocrisy when property division comes. They reveal that their love is conditional and that their daughters are ultimately outsiders in the family tree.

The False Excuses Parents Make

Parents often use flimsy excuses to justify their favouritism.

“We gave dowry during marriage.” But dowry is illegal, immoral, and oppressive. It cannot replace a daughter’s rightful inheritance.

 “She will go to another house.” A daughter may live in another home after marriage, but that does not erase her birthright. Blood ties are not erased by marriage rituals.

 “Sons have to look after the parents.” This argument is outdated and false. In countless families, it is the daughters who care for aging parents, while sons often neglect them. Yet, when it comes to inheritance, the same daughters are told they deserve nothing.

 “We have to keep property within the family name.” This is a meaningless excuse, rooted in pride and patriarchy. Property does not carry honour if it is built on injustice.

 The Aftermath of Injustice

 The cruelty of parental partiality creates scars that last for generations.

 Women lose security. Daughters who are denied inheritance are left without financial security, especially if marriages collapse or husbands die.

Families collapse into litigation. Courts across India are clogged with inheritance disputes, most of them involving sisters fighting brothers for a fair share.

 Bitterness spreads. Parents’ favoritism destroys relationships among siblings, creating bitterness that never heals.

 Cycles of discrimination continue. Sons who receive all the property often repeat the same injustice with their own children.

The Harsh Truth: Parents Are Responsible

 It is easy to blame “society” or “tradition,” but the harsh truth is this: parents are personally responsible for this injustice. Every father and mother who denies their daughter a rightful share is guilty of betrayal. They are not passive victims of custom—they are active participants in discrimination.

 Parents must ask themselves: What legacy are they leaving behind? Property may remain in the family name, but their legacy will be one of betrayal and cruelty.

 Lessons from the Mary Roy Case

  The Mary Roy case should have ended the debate forever. It proved that denying daughters inheritance is not just morally wrong but legally indefensible. Yet, even today, decades after the 1986 judgment, countless families continue to practice the same injustice.

 The lesson from Mary Roy’s struggle is clear: laws can be written in books, but unless families change their mindset, daughters will continue to suffer. True justice is not delivered in courtrooms but in the decisions parents make inside their homes.

What Must Change

 Parents must act with fairness. Daughters deserve equal shares in assets—not as charity, but as a matter of right.

 Brothers must stand up for sisters. Sons who stay silent when their sisters are denied property are complicit in the crime.

 Society must shame discrimination. Families that deny daughters should be socially condemned, not celebrated.

 Legal awareness must spread. Many daughters don’t even know their rights. Awareness campaigns are essential.

 Religious and cultural excuses must be discarded. No faith or tradition can justify injustice.

Conclusion: Stop the Betrayal

 The betrayal of daughters by parents is one of the darkest stains on Indian families. It is an injustice that cuts deeper than poverty or hardship because it comes from those who are supposed to protect, love, and cherish. The Mary Roy case was a landmark, but the spirit of that judgment must enter every household.

  Parents must stop hiding behind tradition, dowry, or excuses of family honor. They must realize that love without fairness is hypocrisy. A daughter who is denied her rightful share is not just deprived of property—she is deprived of dignity, belonging, and justice.

 The harsh truth is this: parents who discriminate in inheritance fail as parents. They may leave behind wealth, but they leave a legacy of betrayal and broken families. The only path forward is equality—equal love, equal rights, equal shares. Anything less is cruelty disguised as tradition.

Christians (Catholics) clinging to traditions and rituals — are they losing Christ?

 Instead of fighting about how the Mass is celebrated, Catholics should ask: Am I receiving the Eucharist worthily? Is Christ transforming me into His likeness?

 In so many Catholic communities today, debates rage endlessly about liturgical rubrics: whether the Mass should be in Latin or vernacular, whether the priest should face the people or the altar, whether communion should be on the tongue or in the hand. Parish groups split, friendships are broken, families argue — all over matters that Christ Himself never mentioned. What does this say about where our focus has shifted?

 Christianity, at its very core, is startlingly simple. It began not with rituals, not with incense or vestments, not with carefully worded liturgies or processions, but with a carpenter from Nazareth who called men and women to follow Him. Jesus Christ did not hand His disciples a manual on how to conduct a Mass. He did not give them detailed prescriptions about liturgical colours, chants, incense, or how long a service should last. Instead, He gave them Himself — His life, His words, His example, His sacrifice. Yet, as centuries rolled on, Christians, especially Catholics, became entangled in traditions, customs, and elaborate structures that often risk overshadowing the living essence of Christ’s message.

 This story is not an attempt to discard Catholic identity or belittle its rich heritage. Rather, it is a plea to rediscover what Jesus actually asked of us, and why clinging too tightly to rituals, symbols, and traditions — even when they are beautiful — can sometimes blind us to the true heart of the Gospel.

The Simplicity of Jesus’ Call

When Jesus called Peter, Andrew, James, and John, He did not invite them into a ritualistic system. He said simply: “Follow me.” Following Him meant leaving their nets, their comfort, their old way of life, and embracing a radical new existence cantered on love of God and love of neighbor.

 Jesus did not measure His followers by how perfectly they performed a ceremony. He measured them by their faith, their humility, and their love. The widow who gave two small coins was praised more highly than the rich who made grand offerings. The Good Samaritan who acted with compassion was exalted above priests and Levites who clung to purity laws but ignored mercy.

 Yet, in so many Catholic communities today, debates rage endlessly about liturgical rubrics: whether the Mass should be in Latin or vernacular, whether the priest should face the people or the altar, whether communion should be on the tongue or in the hand. Parish groups split, friendships are broken, families argue — all over matters that Christ Himself never mentioned. What does this say about where our focus has shifted?

The Weight of Human Traditions

 Jesus Himself warned His followers against elevating human traditions above God’s commandments. In Mark’s Gospel, He rebukes the Pharisees: “You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.” These words should pierce Catholic consciences today.

 There is nothing inherently wrong with traditions. They can point us to God, enrich our worship, and root us in history. But when they become the center of our faith, when they overshadow the living Christ, they turn into stumbling blocks. Catholics may find themselves revering the structure of the Mass more than the One who is present in it. They may argue more passionately about rosary beads than about feeding the hungry. They may obsess over whether a church is built in Gothic or modern style while neglecting the broken families around them.

 What is this if not a modern form of Phariseeism — clinging to externals while forgetting mercy, compassion, and justice?

 The Danger of Idolizing Symbols

 Symbols have their place. A crucifix points us to the sacrifice of Christ. A stained-glass window can lift the mind to heaven. Vestments can remind us of sacred dignity. But when symbols themselves become idols, they distort faith.

 Consider how many Catholics feel more offended if someone does not genuflect before the tabernacle than if someone cheats the poor worker of his wages. Consider how some argue endlessly about whether Gregorian chant is superior to contemporary hymns, yet cannot muster energy to reconcile with an estranged sibling.

 Jesus did not die so that people might endlessly argue about ceremonial details. He died so that humanity could be reconciled to God and to one another. Every time Catholics fight more fiercely about incense than about injustice, about church architecture than about acts of charity, they betray the very Gospel they claim to uphold.

 The Eucharist: A Meal of Love, Not a Battlefield of Rites

 Of all Catholic traditions, the Mass is the most central. Rightly so — it commemorates the Last Supper, Christ’s self-giving on the Cross, and His resurrection presence among His people. Yet how often has this sacred gift become the center of bitter divisions?

 Some insist the Mass must be celebrated only in Latin. Others reject traditional forms and demand constant innovation. Some argue about kneeling, standing, or receiving on the tongue. Still others debate endlessly about liturgical orientation. But pause for a moment: did Jesus at the Last Supper make any of these demands?

 He took bread, blessed it, broke it, and gave it to His disciples with the words: “This is my body.” He took the cup, gave thanks, and said: “This is my blood of the covenant, poured out for many.” His focus was on self-giving love, on remembering Him, on sharing life. It was a meal of humility, unity, and love. To weaponize the Mass as a battlefield of rites is to empty it of its true power.

 The Early Church: A Community of Faith, Not Ceremony

 The Acts of the Apostles paints a striking picture of the early Church. Believers gathered in homes, shared meals, prayed together, and sold their possessions to provide for the needy. They broke bread in joy and simplicity of heart.

 There were no cathedrals. No marble altars. No incense or vestments. Yet the Church grew explosively, transforming the Roman Empire. Why? Because people saw authentic love, unity, and courage. They saw men and women who cared for the sick during plagues, who forgave their persecutors, who shared all things in common. The early Christians attracted others not through ceremonies but through radical Christ-like living.

 This should challenge Catholics today. If the Church could grow so powerfully without elaborate rituals, why do we now sometimes cling to them as if they were the essence of faith itself?

A Faith of the Heart

The danger of overemphasizing traditions is that faith becomes external. People begin to measure holiness by attendance at devotions, by the way someone crosses themselves, or by their preference for a particular liturgical style. But Christ looks deeper. He said: “These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.”

Holiness is not about perfect ritual performance. It is about transformation of the heart. It is about forgiveness, compassion, humility, justice, and mercy. The saints the Church venerates were not saints because they defended one liturgical form over another. They were saints because they loved Christ passionately and poured themselves out for others.

Francis of Assisi stripped himself of worldly wealth to embrace the poor. Teresa of Calcutta picked up the dying from the streets. Maximilian Kolbe gave his life for another prisoner. Their holiness had little to do with ritual debates and everything to do with living the Gospel radically.

The Call to Refocus

So what should Catholics do? It is not necessary to abolish traditions. They can still inspire and guide. But they must never take the center. The focus must always be Christ Himself, His life, His teachings, His love.

Instead of fighting about how the Mass is celebrated, Catholics should ask: Am I receiving the Eucharist worthily? Is Christ transforming me into His likeness?
Instead of obsessing about the correct form of prayer, they should ask: Is my heart burning with love for God and neighbor?
Instead of arguing about sacred art or architecture, they should ask: Am I caring for the poor, the lonely, the forgotten?

Traditions can be good servants, but they are terrible masters. When they begin to master faith, they suffocate it.

Returning to the Essence

At the end of time, when we stand before God, He will not ask us whether we preferred Latin or vernacular, whether we bowed or genuflected, whether we used incense or not. He will ask us whether we loved Him with all our heart and whether we loved our neighbor as ourselves.

The danger for Catholics is not that they have too few traditions, but that they give them too much importance. Christ did not come to establish a museum of rituals. He came to set the world on fire with love.

It is time to return to the essence. To strip away the layers that distract. To remember that Christianity is not about external show but about interior transformation. To live as the first Christians did — with simplicity of heart, boldness of witness, and joy of spirit.

Conclusion: Christ Alone

The Catholic Church is rich in heritage, but heritage must never overshadow the Head of the Church, who is Christ Himself. Catholics must guard against the temptation to cling to rituals, symbols, and debates that distract from the radical call of the Gospel.

Christ alone is enough. His love is enough. His words are enough. His sacrifice is enough. Everything else — liturgy, vestments, traditions, symbols — is secondary.

Let Catholics, then, not lose themselves in defending shadows while neglecting the Light. Let them not fight over rituals while ignoring the cry of the poor. Let them not build their identity on traditions that Jesus never commanded, but on the living faith that He entrusted to His disciples: “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

---

 

How the Catholic Church Declined in Europe in the Last 200 Years

  Europe once called itself Christendom. The continent that gave birth to saints, theologians, reformers, and missionaries once crowned kings beneath cathedral domes and marched armies under the sign of the cross. But look at Europe today: faith has been hollowed out, churches stand empty, and the Catholic Church—once the most powerful spiritual and moral force in the West—has shrunk into irrelevance. In many European capitals, the remnants of Catholic grandeur are not houses of prayer but tourist museums, restaurants, hotels, and even bars. In two centuries, what was once the very soul of Europe has been gutted and replaced with a hollow secularism, a consumerist addiction, and a cynical mockery of faith.

 This is not merely decline. It is a collapse. A self-inflicted wound.

Enlightenment and the Seeds of Rebellion

The decline of Catholicism in Europe did not begin with empty pews in the twentieth century. Its roots stretch back to the so-called Enlightenment of the eighteenth century. Philosophers and intellectuals, drunk on reason, science, and human arrogance, declared that man no longer needed God. Reason became the new deity. Voltaire mocked the Church; Rousseau dreamed of a human-cantered utopia; others saw religion as superstition. By the early 19th century, these ideas had spread like wildfire.

 The Catholic Church, once the unquestioned voice of morality, was suddenly dismissed as an obstacle to progress. Faith became an embarrassment among the educated classes. This shift in mindset was deadly, because when belief erodes among the elites, it eventually trickles down to the masses.

The French Revolution and the War on Faith

 The French Revolution epitomized Europe’s rebellion against the Catholic Church. Priests were butchered, monasteries burned, churches desecrated. Altars were smashed, relics destroyed, and the so-called Goddess of Reason was enthroned in Notre Dame. Though France would later reconcile partially with Catholicism, the Revolution marked a permanent scar. The Church was no longer untouchable. It could be mocked, trampled, and discarded.

 This spirit spread throughout Europe. The 19th century brought waves of anti-clericalism—especially in France, Italy, Spain, and later even Germany. Secular governments stripped the Church of lands, schools, and authority. Catholicism became tolerated but despised, mocked as a relic of the past.

Industrialization and the New Gods

 As factories rose and cities grew, the working classes abandoned the rhythms of parish life. Sunday Mass was replaced by shifts in factories. The ringing of church bells could not compete with the roaring of machines. Industrialization produced money, technology, and science—new gods that Europe began to worship.

 At the same time, the rise of modern ideologies—Marxism, liberalism, nationalism—created rival faiths. Workers rallied not under the crucifix but under red banners. Nations demanded loyalty that once belonged to God. The Church struggled to speak to this new world, but its voice grew weaker, drowned by the promises of progress and utopia.

The 20th Century: Wars and the Collapse of Authority

 The two world wars shattered Europe, and with them, faith itself. Millions died in trenches, in concentration camps, in bombed-out cities. Where was God in Auschwitz? Where was the Church when bombs fell on London, Dresden, and Warsaw? People asked these questions, and many concluded that religion had no answers.

After World War II, Europe rose from the ashes not with renewed faith but with hardened secularism. The project of European integration—the EU—was not built on Christian foundations but on bureaucratic, economic, and secular ideals. Faith was deemed irrelevant to progress.

 Worse, during this same century, the Catholic Church’s credibility took fatal blows. In countries like France, Belgium, and Spain, the Church had aligned itself with reactionary monarchies and dictatorships. When those regimes fell, so did the Church’s standing. By tying itself to power, it lost moral authority among ordinary people.

Vatican II and the Internal Weakening

 In the 1960s, Vatican II tried to modernize the Church. Instead of fortifying faith, it accelerated decline in Europe. Altars were overturned, Latin abandoned, traditions discarded. In the name of relevance, the Church stripped itself of mystery and majesty. The Mass became banal. The Church tried to be modern, but modernity already had better offers—cinema, television, politics, and consumerism.

 The faithful, already weakened by secularism, now found little reason to stay. Attendance collapsed. Vocations to priesthood and religious life dried up. Convents and monasteries emptied. The Catholic Church in Europe ceased to inspire awe and instead looked lost, apologetic, desperate to fit in.

Scandals: The Final Betrayal

If wars and secularism weakened the Church, the abuse scandals destroyed whatever credibility remained. The revelations of priests abusing children—and bishops covering up—were the final nails in the coffin. Europeans who still clung to faith turned away in disgust. For a continent already skeptical of religion, the scandals confirmed every suspicion: that the Church was corrupt, hypocritical, and morally bankrupt.

 Trust collapsed. Even devout Catholic families began drifting away. For the younger generations, the Church became not just irrelevant but toxic.

The Churches Become Bars and Hotels

 The most visible symbol of Catholic decline is the fate of Europe’s churches. Walk through Belgium, the Netherlands, or Germany today: majestic churches stand abandoned, stripped of their sacred purpose. Some are museums, preserved for tourists. Others have become libraries, markets, concert halls. Many are worse: pubs, nightclubs, even hotels where the altar is now a bar counter.

 What greater humiliation can there be for a faith that once crowned emperors in these very buildings? Where choirs once sang hymns to God, drunken crowds now cheer football matches. Where incense once rose, the stench of beer and vomit fills the air.

 This is not just decline—it is desecration. And it is tolerated because Europeans no longer see churches as holy spaces, but as mere real estate.

Secular Europe: A Godless Continent

 Today, Europe is the least religious continent in the world. In countries like the Czech Republic, over 70% identify with no religion. In France, fewer than 5% attend weekly Mass. In Germany and Belgium, parishes close every year. Even in once-devout Ireland, Mass attendance has collapsed. The Catholic Church is a shell, clinging to old buildings but with no living faith inside.

 Secularism dominates politics, education, and culture. Abortion, same-sex marriage, and euthanasia—all condemned by Catholic teaching—are widely legalized. The Church’s voice is not just ignored but mocked. Politicians no longer fear its moral authority because it has none.

 Europe has effectively declared independence from God. It celebrates science, technology, wealth, and freedom but has emptied itself spiritually. Cathedrals remain, but as tourist attractions, stripped of living faith.

The Price of Apostasy

 Europe believes it has freed itself from the shackles of religion. But the price is evident. The continent is facing a demographic collapse: birth rates are at historic lows, families disintegrate, loneliness spreads like a plague. Without faith, Europe has no moral anchor, no higher purpose. Consumerism fills the void, but it cannot satisfy the soul.

 Meanwhile, Islam—once resisted by Catholic Europe at Tours, Lepanto, and Vienna—is growing rapidly through immigration and higher birth rates. In some European cities, mosques are being built while churches are being sold. The irony is brutal: a continent that abandoned its own faith may soon find itself defined by another.

The Great Apostasy of Our Time

 The Catholic Church in Europe has not simply declined—it has committed suicide. It surrendered to secularism, diluted its message, chased after modernity, and betrayed its people through scandals. The result is a hollowed-out institution that inspires neither fear nor love, only indifference.

 Europe’s cathedrals, once living monuments to faith, are now empty shells. Some serve as museums for tourists with cameras. Others echo with drunken laughter. These are not just buildings—they are tombstones of a once-great civilization that has abandoned its soul.

Conclusion: From Christendom to Post-Christian Wasteland

 Two centuries ago, Europe was the heart of Christendom. Today, it is a post-Christian wasteland. The Catholic Church, once powerful, is reduced to begging for relevance. Its churches are sold, its priests are few, its faithful are old.

 The decline of Catholicism in Europe is not a mere demographic trend—it is the death of a civilization’s faith. Europe has traded God for reason, faith for science, families for individualism, and cathedrals for bars. The result is spiritual emptiness masked by material wealth.

 The tragedy is that Europe, in rejecting Catholicism, has rejected the very foundation of its culture, art, morality, and identity. What remains is a hollow civilization, prosperous but purposeless, rich but soulless.

 The sight of churches turned into hotels and bars is more than symbolic. It is Europe’s confession: the cross has been abandoned, the altar dismantled, and the chalice replaced with beer mugs. What once was Christendom is now nothing more than a graveyard of faith.

 

The wound of betrayal: A Catholic father’s cry against son’s marriage outside the faith

A Father’s Grief Over His Son

By Mark Antony

London, September 4

 My heart feels torn in a way words can scarcely carry. A father’s love is supposed to rejoice in the happiness of his son, to watch him walk into the future with joy, to bless him as he builds his home. But how do I rejoice, how do I bless, when the very foundation of that future is built on sand, not on the Rock of Christ? My son, my own flesh and blood, raised in the faith of Jesus Christ, has chosen to marry a non-believer. The news fell on me like a thunderbolt—unexpected, shattering, and heavy beyond measure.

 I cannot describe the agony of realizing that the faith that carried our family through generations, the faith for which our forefathers endured trials, persecutions, and even martyrdom, is now being casually discarded by my own child. I raised him in the Church. I taught him the Catechism. I prayed with him at night when he was a boy. I led him to the altar to receive his First Holy Communion. I watched him grow into a young man, believing—sometimes foolishly—that the faith had taken root in his heart. And yet, here I stand today, broken by the truth that his faith is shallow, incomplete, a mere shadow of what it ought to be.

 Marriage is not a social contract. It is not just two people holding hands and smiling before cameras. It is a covenant before God. When two Christians marry, Christ Himself is at the centre, uniting them, blessing them, becoming the third strand in a cord that cannot be broken. But when a Christian marries a non-believer, it is not Christ who stands at the centre—it is compromise. It is division. It is light trying to walk with darkness, and the two will never find true peace.

 I told him this. I pleaded with him. I reminded him of the words of Scripture: “Do not be  unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?” (2 Corinthians 6:14). He looked at me with indifference, almost annoyance, as though I were speaking outdated traditions that no longer matter. My own son, who once knelt beside me in church, now looks at faith as something optional, negotiable, even dispensable when love or desire calls.

 How can I, as a father, stand and smile at such a union? How can I place my hand on his head and bless him when I know that he is turning his back on the covenant of Christ? My heart says I should rejoice for his happiness, but my soul trembles with sorrow because this happiness is shallow, fleeting, and bound to wound.

 It feels like betrayal—not of me, but of Christ. For marriage is not simply about two individuals—it is about two families, two faiths, two legacies, two heritages coming together. And what heritage does my son wish to pass on? Will he raise his children in the faith? Will he kneel with them at Mass? Will he teach them to pray the rosary, to honour the Eucharist, to confess their sins? Or will they grow up in confusion, half-believing, half-doubting, torn between Christ and the world?

 I look at the woman he has chosen. I do not despise her. She may be kind, respectful, even loving. But she does not know my Lord. She does not bow before the Cross. She does not believe that Christ died and rose for her salvation. How then can she walk hand in hand with my son into a covenant meant to glorify God? Even if she promises respect, even if she assures us of tolerance, how long will that last when real decisions come—when it comes to raising children, when it comes to choosing worship, when it comes to living a Christian witness before the world?

 My tears are not for myself. They are for my son. He does not see the danger. He is blinded by emotions that will fade, but faithlessness has consequences that endure. He thinks he can manage both—marry outside the faith and still keep a lukewarm grip on Christianity. But lukewarmness is vomited out by the Lord (Revelation 3:16). Faith is not meant to be half-hearted, and marriage cannot thrive on half-truths.

 I have prayed nights without sleep. I have begged the Lord to turn his heart back, to open his eyes before it is too late. And yet, God has given man free will, and it is this free will that cuts deepest. My son is free to choose, even if his choice breaks my heart and wounds his soul. I cannot force him, though everything in me longs to shake him and bring him back to the truth.

 The sorrow of a Catholic father is not just that his son is marrying outside the faith, but that in doing so, he is abandoning the inheritance of Christ. This inheritance is more precious than wealth, more lasting than lands, more glorious than earthly honour. It is the inheritance of salvation, the inheritance of the sacraments, the inheritance of grace. To throw that away for the sake of worldly love is the greatest tragedy.

 And yet, as heart-broken as I am, I still ask: is there a way out for him? Is there redemption? Can he still be saved from the error of his ways? My hope rests on the same Christ he now disregards. The prodigal son wandered far from his father’s house, squandering his inheritance, only to return broken, ashamed, but repentant. And the father embraced him. Perhaps my son, too, will one day see the emptiness of a marriage not cantered in Christ. Perhaps the trials of life will teach him what I could not. Perhaps he will come running back to the Lord in tears, and the Lord—merciful beyond measure—will welcome him home.

 Until then, my duty is to pray unceasingly. I cannot bless this union, but I can intercede for his soul. I cannot stand with joy at his wedding, but I can kneel with tears before the tabernacle. I can carry his name to the altar day after day, begging Christ to pierce his heart, to draw him back, to reveal Himself in power and mercy.

 As for me, I will not give up. I may be broken, but I am not hopeless. My faith teaches me that no soul is beyond redemption, no wanderer too far gone for the Shepherd to seek. If the Lord could rescue Augustine from his rebellion, if He could transform Saul into Paul, then surely He can reach my son, even if it takes years of struggle, even if it takes heartbreak.

 But until that day comes, the wound remains. I am a father torn between love for my son and loyalty to my Saviour. I am asked to celebrate when I can only mourn. I am told to move with the times when I know eternity is at stake. I am asked to smile when my soul is on its knees in grief.

 So I will carry this cross. I will pray, I will plead, I will endure. And I will wait for the day when my son, who has strayed from the faith of his fathers, comes home again—not just to me, but to Christ. For only then will my broken heart find healing. Only then will the tears of a father be wiped away.

 

Breaking generational bondages: how to defeat ancestral curses through Christ

 While bondages can pass through generations, they do not have to. In Christ, the power to break the chain is real.

 

 The Bible affirms that certain bondages—especially those tied to sin, idolatry, and rebellion against God—can pass from one generation to the next. This idea is often referred to as generational curses or generational iniquity. These aren't merely inherited behaviors or family traits but spiritual consequences of sin that ripple through bloodlines if not broken.

In Exodus 20:5, God declares, “I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me.” Similar language is found in Exodus 34:7 and Numbers 14:18, indicating that the spiritual consequences of sin can last for generations. These verses point to a pattern of bondage—not that God arbitrarily punishes innocent children, but that when sin is left unrepented and unchecked, its effects accumulate through families.

This plays out in Scripture: King David’s sin with Bathsheba didn’t end with his repentance; consequences haunted his house through Absalom’s rebellion and turmoil in his kingdom (2 Samuel 12-18). Likewise, Achan’s disobedience led to the destruction of his entire household (Joshua 7), showing that individual actions can defile and bring destruction upon families.

However, the Bible also offers a way out. Ezekiel 18:20 brings balance: “The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father… the soul who sins shall die.” This highlights individual responsibility and God's justice. In the New Testament, Galatians 3:13 is the ultimate declaration of freedom: “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.”

So, while bondages can pass through generations, they do not have to. In Christ, the power to break the chain is real. Through repentance, prayer, renunciation of ancestral sins, and the power of Jesus’ blood, believers can stop the inheritance of bondage and begin a legacy of righteousness.

Spiritual history may shape your starting point, but it does not have to define your future.

Sin has consequences

The Bible is relentless in its warning: sin has consequences, and those consequences can echo through bloodlines. Generational bondage—whether called iniquity, curses, or ancestral guilt—can grip families with recurring patterns of failure, sickness, addiction, or spiritual deadness. This is not metaphysical speculation but a hard reality addressed repeatedly in Scripture, a reality that demands both recognition and resistance.

In the Old Testament, God’s justice and mercy are revealed side by side. Exodus 20:5 delivers a chilling warning: “I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the iniquity of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me.” But God’s grace dimensions the other side of the coin in verse 6: “showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.” The message is deadly serious: sin has a legacy—but so does repentance and loyalty to God.

This idea resurfaces in Exodus 34:6–7, emphasizing God’s character: merciful and gracious, yet refusing to clear the guilty, visiting iniquity across generations.  And yet, Ezekiel demolishes any notion of inherited personal guilt with Ephesians 18:20—“The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the guilt of the father.” The tension between these texts reveals a truth: inherited toxic patterns exist—but each person remains responsible before God. Salvation through Christ redefines that responsibility, freeing individuals to break the cycle.

Generational curse isn’t mere talk; it’s real in family life. Patterns of addiction, relational breakdown, mental illness, poverty, violence—these can rear their heads repeatedly across generations. Counseling professionals and pastors alike observe this, recognizing spiritual strongholds at the heart of recurring dysfunction.

So how do we break free? The Bible doesn’t leave us stranded in despair. Galatians 3:13 opens the door wide: “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us…” In Him, the cycle is fractured. We aren’t doomed to repeat the sins of our ancestors.

The warfare begins with recognition. A person must identify the patterns and root issues running through their family. Hosea 4:6 warns that lack of knowledge destroys us. You can’t liberate what you don’t recognize.

Once patterns are identified, we declare our freedom in Christ. Galatians 3:13-14 promises redemption and inheritance through Jesus. Speak it. Believe it. Rewrite your family's spiritual script.

Confession is the next ambush tactic. 1 John 1:9 assures us: if we confess, He is faithful and just to cleanse us from unrighteousness. Confess personal and generational sins alike. Renounce them. Turn away fully, not just for yourself but on behalf of your bloodline.

When repentance happens, begin to replace patterns. Romans 12:2 insists on transformation through renewing your mind—this is non-negotiable. Start small. If anger dominated your parents, cultivate patience. If addictions plagued your grandparents, embrace sobriety and accountability. Build new, godly traditions.

Bind up the enemy

Binding and loosing give spiritual teeth to these steps. Jesus said in Matthew 16:19, “Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven.” Declare yourself free from generational curses. Bind up the enemy. Loose blessings. Prayer and fasting amplify this warfare. In Matthew 17:21, Jesus admitted, “This kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting.” Use fasting to strip away the flesh and heighten dependence on the Spirit.

Forgiveness cuts the cords that tether us to the past. Holding resentments against ancestors or family members gives the enemy purchase. Christian humility demands releasing them into God’s hands—even if justice has not been served.

Remove objects or influences tied to occultism, superstition, or sin. Break soul ties—those spiritual chains formed by ungodly connections. Such ties must be severed for full deliverance.

Root your healing in Scripture. Verses like Psalm 107:20, Psalm 119:105, Galatians 5:1, 2 Corinthians 5:17 become weapons and lifelines. Declare them over your home, your habits, your family’s future.

Support matters. James 5:16 encourages confession to one another for healing. Align with spiritually mature believers who can speak truth, keep you accountable, and pray for you in warfare.

Deliverance is real. The cross disarmed principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15). Christians aren’t powerless. If necessary, seek pastoral deliverance prayers, exorcism, or spiritual counsels—but always with biblical oversight and accountability.

This all isn’t fluff. Real Christians and families testify to breakthrough: restored peace, healed bodies, freedom from addiction, renewed relationships. Darkness yields when confronted with repentance, faith, Scripture, and the authority of Christ.

Generational bondage is not invincible. The blood of Jesus is more powerful. Your past ancestry does not determine your destiny. You are a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17)—the old has died. Walk in that truth. End the cycle. Begin the legacy of hope.